FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr18400.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-11a.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-11a.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-2.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-34.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-66.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-93.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-all.c (test for excess errors) have appeared on mainline on i686-pc-linux-gnu (and from gcc-testresults it seems some other platforms too) between 20050517 and 20050518. All seem to be of the form "internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:750".
Also new today on i686-pc-linux: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 -O (test for excess errors) I can't confirm the C failures because I only run the Fortran testsuite.
Confirmed.
The ICE shows up on powerpc-linux with this patch from rakdver: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00814.html
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/vect failures > ------- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 19:06 ------- > The ICE shows up on powerpc-linux with this patch from rakdver: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00814.html yes, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00342.html and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00803.html. Zdenek
The following failures appeared on ia64-hpux between 20050517 and 20050519 (on 20050518 there was a bootstrap failure) and appear to be the same bug. FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11b.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-2.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-34.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-66.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-all.c (test for excess errors)
These failures should have been fixed after this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg02756.html With the fix above I no longer see these testcase failures on powerpc-apple- darwin, but the ICEs reported in PR21155 and PR21789 still remain (these PRs do look related, but the fix above apparently did not cover these cases).
Fixed.