Bug 20549 - [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in resolve_overloaded_unification on invalid code
Summary: [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in resolve_overloaded_unification on invalid code
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 21592
Alias: None
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: c++ (show other bugs)
Version: 3.4.0
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: 4.0.2
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Depends on:
Blocks: 21352
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2005-03-19 08:46 UTC by Ivan Godard
Modified: 2005-07-25 13:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed: 2005-07-12 06:01:03

Attachments
compiler output (-v) (742 bytes, text/plain)
2005-03-19 08:47 UTC, Ivan Godard 		Details
source code (-save-temps, compressed) (140.96 KB, application/x-gzip)
2005-03-19 08:48 UTC, Ivan Godard 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ivan Godard 2005-03-19 08:46:42 UTC
Comment 1 Ivan Godard 2005-03-19 08:47:28 UTC 
Created attachment 8421 [details]
compiler output (-v)
Comment 2 Ivan Godard 2005-03-19 08:48:04 UTC 
Created attachment 8422 [details]
source code (-save-temps, compressed)
Comment 3 Andrew Pinski 2005-03-19 13:30:29 UTC 
Reduced testcase:
template<typename t1, typename t2>
  t1 unique(t1 v1, t1 v2, t2 v3){}
struct row
{
  int begin() const ;
  int end() const;
};
template<int s>
void popSlot()
{
  row ops;
  unique(ops.begin, ops.end);
}


This is invalid code.
Comment 4 Kriang Lerdsuwanakij 2005-03-20 14:00:26 UTC 
Here is the error message:

pr20549.C: In function 'void popSlot()':
pr20549.C:12: internal compiler error: in resolve_overloaded_unification, at
cp/pt.c:9579
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Comment 5 Andrew Pinski 2005-03-24 18:10:14 UTC 
: Search converges between 2003-07-08-trunk (#288) and 2003-07-09-trunk (#289).
Comment 6 Andrew Pinski 2005-07-22 21:13:01 UTC 
Moving to 4.0.2 pre Mark.
Comment 7 Volker Reichelt 2005-07-25 13:22:48 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21592 ***