[committed] libstdc++: container erasure overloads (P2077) [PR117404]
Nathan Myers
ncm@cantrip.org
Fri Feb 6 08:34:36 GMT 2026
Patched 786e316de5c25a3fddeaa2003f6efb64fb5ab4a9
On 2/6/26 3:07 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2026, 23:58 Jakub Jelinek, <jakub@redhat.com
> <mailto:jakub@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Nathan Myers wrote:
> > +#ifdef __cpp_concepts
> > +template <typename _Kt, typename _Container>
> > + concept __not_container_iterator =
> > + (!is_convertible_v<_Kt&&, typename _Container::iterator> &&
> > + !is_convertible_v<_Kt&&, typename _Container::const_iterator>);
> > +
> > +template <typename _Kt, typename _Container>
> > + concept __heterogeneous_key =
> > + (!is_same_v<typename _Container::key_type,
> remove_cvref_t<_Kt>>) &&
>
> Shouldn't this be __remove_cvref_t ?
> I see
> +FAIL: g++.dg/concepts/expression.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess
> errors)
> +UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/concepts/expression.C -std=gnu++17 compilation
> failed to produce executable
> remove_cvref_t is C++20 feature, and while concepts are also a C++20
> feature, we allow -fconcepts -std=c++17 to enable concepts already.
>
>
> Then maybe the new concepts should be guarded by __glibcxx_concepts for
> the library support, or by a macro specific to the container features.
>
> We don't need or want to find that concept for C++17.
>
>
>
> Jakub
>
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list