[PATCH v1 0/4] libstdc++: Implement first part of submdspan.
Luc Grosheintz
luc.grosheintz@gmail.com
Wed Oct 8 15:50:23 GMT 2025
On 10/8/25 12:46, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
> I have just landed the first 3 patches.
Thanks, and sorry about not seeing too many cases of line break
after the return type.
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 2:44 PM Luc Grosheintz <luc.grosheintz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/3/25 12:09 PM, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 11:34 AM Luc Grosheintz <luc.grosheintz@gmail.com
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This patch series contains everything up to submdspan_extents and
>>>> implements them as described in N5014, i.e. without P3663.
>>>>
>>>> The reasons to not include P3663 are:
>>>>
>>>> - Doing both allows us to benchmark the change.
>>>>
>>> My concern is that this duplicates the amount of reviews required,
>>> and work spent on this paper.
>>
>> That's a very valid argument. I'll locally incorporate all
>> you feedback for v1. We could pause and continue directly
>> with P3663, is that better for you?
>>
> It would be good to have P3663 implementation experience, before
> November Kona meeting.
Good to know!
>
>>
>> There's a few things I'd like to do:
>>
>> 1. I'm very curious to see if this canonicalization has
>> an impact on the generated code.
>>
> This result seem valuable, so maybe a good option would be to
> get submdspan and submdspan_mapping implemented for layout_left,
> in N5014, and then follow up with P3663 for the same layout. The P3663
> needs to be approved before we merge.
Okay, let's do this. I'd suggest to not be very precise about
checking of preconditions for N5014 (it feels like they're a
little off, and precise testing is what takes most of the time).
Then when we know we want to merge something, we can cleanup
the preconditions.
>
>>
>> 2. I should also re-check the mapping::operator() for all
>> five layouts; and I'd like to analyze some slightly more
>> advanced usecases and compare to naive almost C-style code.
>>
> Yes, I would be interested in seeing that afterwards, especially as this is
> related
> to the simplification of pad version of linear index left/right.
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Carefully implementing both, automatically leads to looking at the
>>>> problem from different angles. We can spot differences between the
>>>> two proposals. One such difference is that P3663 seems to allow
>>>> ambiguous slices, e.g. slices that convert to both full_extent and
>>>> index_type.
>>>>
>>> Yes, this was an intentional change in the paper.
>>
>> That's interesting, what was the reason?
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> - P3663 hasn't been finalized yet, if we implement it now we'll need
>>>> to keep track of the difference. That's easier (or at least not
>>>> harder) if we have a commit containing the already applied changes
>>>> from N5014.
>>>>
>>> We hope that it will be finalized in today's telecon.
>>
>> Congrats & best of luck!
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> - With a casting layer in place, the changes in the paper are quite
>>>> contained, e.g. remove cases for handling tuple, slightly refine
>>>> the range checks of slices (more can be done at compile-time).
>>>>
>>> The wording before P3663 does not allow slices to be canonicalized
>>> before calling submdspan_mapping customization point, at least for user
>>> defined-layouts. This is not an issue for the sub extents, as it is not
>>> customizable.
>>> But it will show up in the next commits. Maybe it is less of the issues
>> as
>>> __subextents
>>> will already perform most of the required checks.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> - We could easily revert P3663 if needed.
>>>>
>>>> Luc Grosheintz (4):
>>>> libstdc++: Implement strided_slice from <mdspan>. [PR110352]
>>>> libstdc++: Implement full_extent_t. [PR110352]
>>>> libstdc++: Implement submdspan_mapping_result. [PR110352]
>>>> libstdc++: Implement submdspan_extents. [PR110352]
>>>>
>>>> libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.def | 9 +
>>>> libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.h | 9 +
>>>> libstdc++-v3/include/std/mdspan | 311 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>> libstdc++-v3/src/c++23/std.cc.in | 7 +-
>>>> .../testsuite/23_containers/mdspan/int_like.h | 9 +
>>>> .../mdspan/submdspan/strided_slice.cc | 46 +++
>>>> .../mdspan/submdspan/strided_slice_neg.cc | 19 ++
>>>> .../mdspan/submdspan/submdspan_extents.cc | 159 +++++++++
>>>> .../mdspan/submdspan/submdspan_extents_neg.cc | 66 ++++
>>>> 9 files changed, 633 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644
>>>> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/mdspan/submdspan/strided_slice.cc
>>>> create mode 100644
>>>>
>> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/mdspan/submdspan/strided_slice_neg.cc
>>>> create mode 100644
>>>>
>> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/mdspan/submdspan/submdspan_extents.cc
>>>> create mode 100644
>>>>
>> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/mdspan/submdspan/submdspan_extents_neg.cc
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.50.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list