[PATCH] libstdc++: testsuite: Add climits missing test case

[Xavier Bonaventura]

I can do that if you prefer. I just followed this approach for consistency
because it was the one followed for cfloat test.

El dl., 3 de nov. 2025, 16:01, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> va
escriure:

>
>
> On Monday, 3 November 2025, Xavier Bonaventura <xavibonaventura@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, sorry but I screwed up my previous mail. This is my first patch and
>> the first time I submit a patch to a mailing list.
>>
>> Now that I know how to add an introduction before sending a patch, let
>> me explain a bit.
>> When taking a look to the test suite of the standard library I found
>> what I believe it was a missing test case. I do not think this is
>> intentional. Because I believe the change is trivial (famous last words)
>> I just provide the patch.
>> I run the tests for 18_support for unix and they were passing.
>> I read quite a lot of documents about contributing, but I might have
>> miss some part. If that is the case let me know and sorry for that.
>>
>
> Thanks, the patch looks correct.
>
> But we could also just add those lines to the existing values.cc guarded
> by #if __cpluscplus >= 201103
>
> I don't think there's any advantage to testing once with the long long
> constants and again with them. One test is enough.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20251103/4de0e326/attachment.htm>