[PATCH][_GLIBCXX_INLINE_VERSION] Adapt to_chars/from_chars symbols
François Dumont
frs.dumont@gmail.com
Mon Nov 28 18:43:33 GMT 2022
On 28/11/22 11:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 10:10, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 06:07, François Dumont via Libstdc++
> <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org <mailto:libstdc%2B%2B@gcc.gnu.org>> wrote:
>
> This patch is fixing those tests:
>
> 20_util/to_chars/float128_c++23.cc
> std/format/formatter/requirements.cc
> std/format/functions/format.cc
> std/format/functions/format_to_n.cc
> std/format/functions/size.cc
> std/format/functions/vformat_to.cc
> std/format/string.cc
>
> Note that symbols used in <format> for __ibm128 and __iee128
> are untested.
>
> I even wonder if the normal mode ones are because I cannot
> find the
> symbols used in gnu.ver.
>
>
> libstdc++: [_GLIBCXX_INLINE_VERSION] Add to_chars/from_chars
> symbols export
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
>
> * include/std/format
> [_GLIBCXX_INLINE_VERSION](to_chars):
> Adapt __asm symbol
> specifications.
> * config/abi/pre/gnu-versioned-namespace.ver: Add
> to_chars/from_chars symbols
> export.
>
> Ok to commit ?
>
>
>
> Why are changes needed to the linker script?
>
> Those functions should already match the general wildcard:
>
> # Names inside the 'extern' block are demangled names.
> extern "C++"
> {
> std::*;
> std::__8::*;
> };
>
>
>
No idear, my guess was that it has something to do with the __asm usages
in <format> and with the commnt:
// These overloads exist in the library, but are not declared for C++20.
// Make them available as std::__format::to_chars.
Maybe they exist in the library but are unused so not exported unless
specified in the linker script ?
>
> Instead of nine separate #if blocks, can we just do:
>
> #if _GLIBCXX_INLINE_VERSION
> # define _GLIBCXX_ALIAS(S) __asm("_ZNSt3__8" S)
> #else
> # define _GLIBCXX_ALIAS(S) __asm("_ZNSt" S)
> #endif
>
> And then use:
>
> _GLIBCXX_ALIAS("8to_charsPcS_eSt12chars_format");
>
> and finally:
>
> #undef _GLIBCXX_ALIAS
>
>
I tried and as expected it's not working because the diff in the symbol
is not limited to the '3__8' pattern. 'chars_format' is also defined in
versioned namespace which might perhaps explain some mangling diff.
Here is an updated patch though, I had forgotten to replace a _DF128
with a __ieee128 in the untested part of this patch.
If you prefer to take a closer look later I'll just re-submit my patch
to move versioned namespace mode to cxx11 abi knowing that those tests
are already FAIL.
François
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list