[PATCH] libstdc++: testsuite: fs rename to self may fail
Alexandre Oliva
oliva@adacore.com
Thu Jun 23 03:59:14 GMT 2022
On Jun 22, 2022, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 08:02, Alexandre Oliva via Libstdc++
> <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello, Sebastian,
>>
>> On Jun 22, 2022, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>
>> > On 22/06/2022 08:24, Alexandre Oliva via Libstdc++ wrote:
>> >> rtems6's rename() implementation errors with EEXIST when the rename-to
>> >> filename exists, even when renaming a file to itself or when renaming
>> >> a nonexisting file. Adjust expectations.
>> >>
>> >> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to
>> >> aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
>> >>
>> >> PS:https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2169 doesn't seem to suggest plans to
>> >> change behavior so as to comply with POSIX.
>>
>> > I would not adjust the test case to cope with systems which are not in
>> > line with POSIX.
>>
>> My understanding is that the libstdc++ testsuite is not meant to test
>> for POSIX conformance, but for conformance with the C++ language
>> standards.
>>
>> C++ inherits rename from C, and C says the behavior is implementation
>> defined if the new name already exists.
> std::filesystem::rename is explicitly specified in terms of POSIX
> rename, not C rename.
Oh, sorry, I stand corrected. I meant ::rename only. My mind seems to
still resist the notion that <filesystem> is standard C++, rather than
an experimental extension proposal :-)
Anyway, I did not realize it deferred to POSIX semantics, even when
that's stricter than C standard. Interesting...
> Instead, the implementation of std::filesystem::rename should have a
> special-case for rtems (and maybe other targets) that implements the
> POSIX rename semantics if calling ::rename isn't good enough.
Given what I've just learned, I agree. Patch withdrawn. I suppose the
other patch, on subdir renaming, must share the same fate.
/me longs for XFAILs for libstdc++ subtests ;-)
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list