[PATCH] Fix _GLIBCXX_DEBUG container allocator aware move constructors
François Dumont
frs.dumont@gmail.com
Sun Mar 28 20:27:24 GMT 2021
On 27/03/21 10:07 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26/03/21 21:41 +0100, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
>> I review the allocator aware move constructors of _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
>> containers.
>>
>> I think the recently added __gnu_debug basic_string one is also
>> missing the rvalue reference, no ?
>
> You mean is_nothrow_constructible<Base, Base&&, const Alloc&> instead
> of is_nothrow_constructible<Base,Base, const Alloc&>?
>
> No, it's not missing. They mean the exact same thing: Base is an
> rvalue, Base&& is an rvalue, and Base& is an lvalue. Writing Base&&
> instead of Base is just extra noise that adds no value.
>
Ok, noted.
>
>> libstdc++: _GLIBCXX_DEBUG Fix allocator aware move constructor
>
> The correct term is "allocator-extended move constructor". And is it
> really a "fix"? The standard doesn't require a noexcept-specifier on
> those constructors, so what we have now is not incorrect, just
> suboptimal.
For the debug list it is a fix because we were missing the _Safe base
class call. For the vector it is also a fix even if a minor one.
>
>> Fix several allocator aware move construtor in _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
>> containers.
>>
>> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>> * include/debug/forward_list
>> (forward_list(forward_list&&, const allocator_type&)):
>> Add noexcept qualification.
>> * include/debug/list (list(list&&, const
>> allocator_type&)): Likewise and add
>> call to safe container allocator aware move constructor.
>> * include/debug/string (basic_string(basic_string&&,
>> const _Allocator&)):
>> Check base type allocator aware more constructor.
>> * include/debug/vector (vector(vector&&, const
>> allocator_type&)):
>> Fix noexcept qualification.
>> *
>> testsuite/23_containers/forward_list/cons/noexcept_move_construct.cc:
>> Add allocator aware move constructor noexceot
>> qualification check.
>> *
>> testsuite/23_containers/list/cons/noexcept_move_construct.cc: Likewise.
>>
>> Tested under linux x86_64.
>>
>> Ok to commit ?
>
> OK, thanks.
>
>
I eventually committed the attached patch.
If you are still interested by _GLIBCXX_DEBUG fixes there is still this one:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2021-March/052176.html
Thanks,
François
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: debug_noexcept-cons.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3452 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20210328/75f70ebc/attachment.bin>
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list