[PATCH] libstdc++: Update ppc32 baseline_symbols.txt

Jonathan Wakely jwakely@redhat.com
Fri Apr 16 19:33:09 GMT 2021


On 16/04/21 20:48 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:14:58PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> As we have only one P1 left right now, I think it is the right time
>> to update abi list files in libstdc++.
>>
>> Attached are two patches, one is update for x86_64/i?86/s390x/ppc64
>> linux (aarch64 seems to be correct already), the other one is the
>> ppc64 -> ppc64le diff.  I have yet to test what exactly it will do
>> on ppc64, whether we can share the same baseline_symbols.txt and it
>> will ignore the IEEE128 symbols like it should be ignoring LDBL symbols
>> when double double is not configured in, or whether we need
>> to have separate powerpc64le-linux-gnu directory.
>
>> 2021-04-16  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>>
>> 	* config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
>> 	* config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/32/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
>> 	* config/abi/post/i386-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
>> 	* config/abi/post/i486-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
>> 	* config/abi/post/s390x-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
>> 	* config/abi/post/powerpc64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
>
>Tested on powerpc64{,le}-linux now (-m32/-m64 on be) and while the first
>patch works fine, the second one unfortunately doesn't on either be or le,
>so more work is needed there.  Thus, I'm withdrawing the second
>	* config/abi/post/powerpc64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
>only patch.
>
>On the other side, when I was on powerpc64-linux, I've created a patch
>for 32-bit powerpc.
>Ok for trunk (this one and the x86_64/i?86/s390x/non-IEEE128 powerpc64 one)?

OK



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list