[PATCH] c++: Stop defining true, false and bool as macros in <stdbool.h>
Jonathan Wakely
jwakely@redhat.com
Wed Sep 2 19:13:26 GMT 2020
Since r216679 these macros have only been defined in C++98 mode, rather
than all modes. That is permitted as a GNU extension because that header
doesn't exist in the C++ standard until C++11, so we can make it do
whatever we want for C++98. But as discussed in the PR c++/60304
comments, these macros shouldn't ever be defined for C++.
This patch removes the macro definitions for C++98 too.
The new test already passed for C++98 (and the conversion is ill-formed
in C++11 and later) so this new test is arguably unnecessary.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR c++/60304
* ginclude/stdbool.h (bool, false, true): Never define for C++.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/60304
* g++.dg/warn/Wconversion-null-5.C: New test.
Back in 2012 Gerald argued that we should keep these macros in case
there is code depending on them. We've not been defining them in C++11
and later modes (including our default -std=gnu++14) for nearly six
years now (GCC 5.1 shipped with the change). I'm not aware of any
reports of problems. I think it's time to stop defining them at all.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux, OK for trunk?
-------------- next part --------------
commit f049cda373d29ea1bce4065b24cbb392cdc5b172
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Sep 2 18:51:28 2020
c++: Stop defining true, false and bool as macros in <stdbool.h>
Since r216679 these macros have only been defined in C++98 mode, rather
than all modes. That is permitted as a GNU extension because that header
doesn't exist in the C++ standard until C++11, so we can make it do
whatever we want for C++98. But as discussed in the PR c++/60304
comments, these macros shouldn't ever be defined for C++.
This patch removes the macro definitions for C++98 too.
The new test already passed for C++98 (and the conversion is ill-formed
in C++11 and later) so this new test is arguably unnecessary.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR c++/60304
* ginclude/stdbool.h (bool, false, true): Never define for C++.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/60304
* g++.dg/warn/Wconversion-null-5.C: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/ginclude/stdbool.h b/gcc/ginclude/stdbool.h
index 72be438692f..1b56498d96f 100644
--- a/gcc/ginclude/stdbool.h
+++ b/gcc/ginclude/stdbool.h
@@ -39,13 +39,6 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively. If not, see
/* Supporting _Bool in C++ is a GCC extension. */
#define _Bool bool
-#if __cplusplus < 201103L
-/* Defining these macros in C++98 is a GCC extension. */
-#define bool bool
-#define false false
-#define true true
-#endif
-
#endif /* __cplusplus */
/* Signal that all the definitions are present. */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wconversion-null-5.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wconversion-null-5.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..05980ea91ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wconversion-null-5.C
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// PR c++/60304
+// { dg-do compile { target c++98_only } }
+// { dg-options "-Wconversion-null" }
+
+#include <stdbool.h>
+int * foo() {return false;} // { dg-warning "converting 'false' to pointer" }
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list