[PATCH] libstdc++: Fix error shown during Solaris build

Jonathan Wakely jwakely@redhat.com
Mon Nov 16 10:32:40 GMT 2020


On 16/11/20 11:17 +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>Hi Jonathan,
>
>> Currently this is shown when building libstdc++ on Solaris:
>>
>> -lrt: open: No such file or directory
>>
>> The error comes from the make_sunver.pl script which tries to open each
>> of its arguments. The arguments are passed by this make rule:
>>
>> 	perl ${glibcxx_srcdir}/scripts/make_exports.pl \
>> 	  libstdc++-symbols.ver \
>> 	  $(libstdc___la_OBJECTS:%.lo=.libs/%.o) \
>> 	 `echo $(libstdc___la_LIBADD) | \
>> 	    sed 's,/\([^/.]*\)\.la,/.libs/\1.a,g'` \
>> 	 > $@ || (rm -f $@ ; exit 1)
>>
>> The $(libstdc___la_LIBADD) variable includes $(GLIBCXX_LIBS) which
>> contains -lrt on Solaris.
>>
>> This patch adds another sed script to filter -l arguments from the echo
>> command. In order to reliably match ' -l[^ ]* ' the echo arguments are
>> quoted and a space added before and after them. This might be overkill
>> just to remove -lrt from the start of the string, but should be robust
>> in case other -l arguments are added to $(GLIBCXX_LIBS), or in case the
>> $(libstdc___la_LIBADD) libraries are reordered.
>>
>> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 	* src/Makefile.am (libstdc++-symbols.ver-sun): Remove -lrt from
>> 	arguments passed to make_sunver.pl script.
>> 	* src/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
>>
>> Tested sparc-solaris2.11. Rainer, does this look OK?
>
>it does, but let me give it a try with both GNU sed and Solaris sed: we
>had too many weird issues with the latter ;-(

I think the machine I tested on (gcc211 in the compile farm) only has
Solaris sed in the PATH, and it works there.

I did try to use "-l ?[[:alnum:]]+" but Solaris sed only supports BREs
(as POSIX requires) and there doesn't seem to be an equivalent of the
GNU sed -E option to use EREs.




More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list