std::jthread::operator=(std::jthread&&) calls std::terminate if *this has an associated running thread.
Paul Scharnofske
asynts@gmail.com
Fri Nov 6 21:49:09 GMT 2020
You are correct, I was not aware of this
(https://stackoverflow.com/a/36393265/8746648).
Here is the simplified patch (mirror:
https://static.asynts.com/2020/11/06/jthread-0002.patch):
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
index 89f9f6c8c38..02e4c3cc8a6 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2020-11-06 Paul Scharnofske <asynts@gmail.com>
+
+ * include/std/thread (operator=(std::jthread&&): Join current
thread if it
+ is running before moving it.
+
2020-11-05 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
PR c++/25814
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/thread
b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/thread
index 887ee579962..a5d60fe7f9f 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/thread
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/thread
@@ -456,7 +456,18 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
operator=(const jthread&) = delete;
jthread&
- operator=(jthread&&) noexcept = default;
+ operator=(jthread&& __other) noexcept
+ {
+ if (joinable())
+ {
+ request_stop();
+ join();
+ }
+
+ swap(__other);
+
+ return *this;
+ }
void
swap(jthread& __other) noexcept
On 11/6/20 10:35 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 23:14, Paul Scharnofske via Libstdc++
> <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> + // The C++ Standard (working draft) says that this
>> method must be
>> + // noexcept, but also dictates that join be called. It
>> doesn't say
>> + // how to do this, this is probably the way to go?
>> + try
>> + {
>> + join();
>> + }
>> + catch (...)
>> + {
>> + std::terminate();
>> + }
>> + }
> Just calling join() will have the same effect, without having to
> bother with the additional catching.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list