Reserve __is_trivially_relocatable for a builtin?

Marc Glisse marc.glisse@inria.fr
Fri Feb 1 23:12:00 GMT 2019


Hello,

in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106#c15 , Arthur O'Dwyer 
suggests that the name __is_trivially_relocatable would be a good name for 
a future builtin, and we should use something else for this class. Does 
anyone have an opinion on whether we should rename and what other name we 
should use? I am tempted by __is_trivially_relocatable__, 
_Is_trivially_relocatable or ___is_trivially_relocatable ...

-- 
Marc Glisse



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list