Relocation (= move+destroy)

[Marc Glisse]

On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Marc Glisse wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> On 18/10/18 21:59 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> 
>>>> That's a good enough reason for me. Unless one of us implements
>>>> noexcept(auto) in GCC and Clang in the next few days, let's go with
>>>> what you have in the patch :-)
>>> 
>>> Just checking: this 'ok' is for the noexcept style, it is not a review for 
>>> the complete patch yet, right?
>> 
>> Right. I think I looked over the rest quickly and it seemed OK, but I
>> thought you were going to send a revised patch changing the triviality
>> test so was going to wait and review the revised patch. But since that
>> change is tiny I can still review the rest now anyway, so I'll do that
>> tomorrow.
>
> Ah, sorry for the misunderstanding, here is the version with is_trivial, 
> which regtested fine. Same ChangeLog.

Uh, why didn't I notice that the function __relocate is unused? I guess 
I'll resend the same patch without __relocate once retesting has finished 
:-( Sorry for all the corrections, I guess I didn't check my patch 
carefully enough before sending it the first time.

-- 
Marc Glisse