Remove is_invocable static assertions in _Rb_tree?

Ville Voutilainen
Thu May 31 10:33:00 GMT 2018

On 31 May 2018 at 13:31, Jonathan Wakely <> wrote:
> Some people are really bad at reading error messages. If the first
> line is a static assertion with a message it can tell them what's
> wrong, so they don't just get confused by the errors. But I think we
> have to just remove the assertions.

I agree that it looks like we need to remove the asserts, and maybe
bring some of them back
somehow in a more limited fashion if we can figure out how to do that,
which is a bit unlikely.

More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list