[v3 PATCH] Implement LWG 2733 and LWG 2759

Jonathan Wakely jwakely@redhat.com
Tue Nov 14 18:08:00 GMT 2017


On 14/11/17 19:51 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
>On 14 November 2017 at 19:06, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Both files can use remove_cv_t instead of remove_cv::type (and there's
>> no need to std-qualify it in std::gcd).
>>
>> They could also use is_integral_v and is_same_v but that's
>> pre-existing, and less important because there's no 'typename' that
>> can be avoided by changing it.
>
>Here's round 2.

OK for trunk, thanks.




More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list