[PATCH] Simplify _Node_insert_return to avoid including <tuple>

Jonathan Wakely jwakely@redhat.com
Fri Nov 3 11:06:00 GMT 2017


On 03/11/17 09:29 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 02/11/17 18:00 -0400, Tim Song wrote:
>>Um, why are those member get's there at all (and with an index mapping
>>that doesn't agree with the member order)? [container.insert.return]
>>says that "It has no base classes or members other than those
>>specified."
>
>Because I forgot to implement https://wg21.link/p0508r0 which changed
>the spec, including the order of the members.
>
>I'll do that shortly, thanks.
>

Fixed by this patch, tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch.txt
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20171103/4474607e/attachment.bin>


More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list