Deprecating arithmetic on std::atomic<void*>
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Thu Apr 20 09:57:00 GMT 2017
On 04/20/2017 11:52 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20/04/17 11:43 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 04/20/2017 11:25 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>>>> I mean, with -pedantic-errors we already error on void * arighmetics
>>>> or function pointer arithmetics. If std::atomic<void*> would use
>>>> the void * arithmetics, it would also reject it. Or does it use
>>>> integer
>>>> arithmetics instead?
>>>
>>> No, it does it on void*, but the __atomic built-ins still perform that
>>> arithmetic even with -pedantic-errors.
>>
>> sizeof is not defined for the relevant types, either, and already
>> triggers a warning by default:
>>
>> t.cc:25:58: warning: invalid application of âsizeofâ to a void type
>> [-Wpointer-arith]
>> _M_type_size(ptrdiff_t __d) const { return __d * sizeof(_PTp); }
>
> That could be easily avoided if we care about supporting arithmetic on
> std::atomic<void*>.
>
>> I think the actual problem here is the suppression of warnings from
>> system headers.
>
> The atomic built-ins still don't warn even with -Wsystem-headers
Sorry, this is what I meant: -pedantic-errors does not catch this case
due to the system header warning suppression. Otherwise, with the
current std::atomic implementation, -pedantic-errors would already
disable the extension on std::atomic alongside with the extension on
built-in pointer types, due to the use of sizeof in the definition of
_M_type_size.
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list