On 05/08/16 12:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >On 04/08/16 23:22 -0700, Tim Shen wrote: >>+ // Stores a void alternative, until void becomes a regular type. > >Personally I hope it won't become a regular type :-) >Let's say "because void is not a regault type" here. That avoids the Let's not say "regault"! I meant to type regular!