miter_base simplification

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 03/05/15 22:19 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>On 30/04/2015 13:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>On 30/04/15 10:40 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>>>On 27/04/2015 13:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>>(Alternatively, could the same simplification be made for
>>>>__miter_base? Do we need _Miter_base<> or just two overloads of
>>>>__miter_base()?)
>>>
>>>Definitely, I already have a patch for that.
>>
>>Great :-)
>
>And here is the patch for this part.
>
>I have implemented it in such a way that it will also remove several 
>layers of move_iterator.
>
>2015-05-04  François Dumont  <fdumont@gcc.gnu.org>
>
>    * include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h
>    (std::move_iterator): Delete declaration.
>    (std::__is_move_iterator<move_iterator>): Move partial 
>specialization...
>    * include/bits/stl_iterator.h: ... here.
>    (std::__miter_base): Overloads for std::reverse_iterator and
>    std::move_iterator.
>    * include/bits/stl_algobase.h (std::__miter_base): Provide default
>    implementation.
>
>Tested under Linux x86_64.
>
>Ok to commit ?

Yes OK, thanks (sorry for forgetting about this patch).