[v3 PATCH] Implement N4387 and LWG 2367

[Ville Voutilainen]

On 8 June 2015 at 18:53, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 June 2015 at 18:37, Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com> wrote:
>> In the hunk below, should the sizes_match template parameter
>> be privatized (since it isn't part of the public interface)?
>> Or perhaps even removed if it's not used?
>
> Yes, it should be uglified, thanks.

Ahem, yes, actually removed since it's there only to be specialized.