Reorganize and clean debug headers

François Dumont frs.dumont@gmail.com
Tue Jan 20 20:41:00 GMT 2015


On 20/01/2015 12:32, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20/01/15 00:10 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>    While working on new debug checks I came up with reorganizing 
>> existing ones to limit as much as possible useless includes.
>>
>>    Tested under linux x86_64.
>>
>>    From the latest mails I saw on this mailing list I guess I must 
>> wait, right ?
>
> Yes, this kind of thing should definitely wait for stage 1.
>
>
I saw you did a number of commit first presented as *not* committed. Is 
it that we are back in stage 1 ?

If not, will there be a communication about it ? I feel like I am always 
missing the information about moves throughout stages.

François



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list