[PATCH C++] - SD-6 Implementation Part 3 - .

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 01/09/14 21:46 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
>Index: testsuite/experimental/feat-lib-fund.cc
>===================================================================
>--- testsuite/experimental/feat-lib-fund.cc	(revision 0)
>+++ testsuite/experimental/feat-lib-fund.cc	(working copy)
>@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>+// { dg-options "-std=gnu++14" }
>+// { dg-do compile }
>+
>+#include <experimental/optional>
>+#include <experimental/string_view>
>+
>+#if !__has_include(<experimental/optional>)
>+#  error "<experimental/optional>"
>+#endif
>+
>+//#if !__has_include(<experimental/net>)
>+//#  error "<experimental/net>"
>+//#endif
>+
>+//#if !__has_include(<experimental/any>)
>+//#  error "<experimental/any>"
>+//#endif
>+
>+//#if !__has_include(<experimental/memory_resource>)
>+//#  error "<experimental/memory_resource>"
>+//#endif
>+
>+#if !__has_include(<experimental/string_view>)
>+#  error "<experimental/string_view>"
>+#endif

Hi Ed,

I'm about to commit std::experimental::apply() from the Library
Fundamentals TS and so wanted to add <experimental/tuple> to your new
feat-lib-fund.cc test.

Should that test be actually including all the files (as it does for
optional and string_view) or just test for their presence?

Should the other headers added by the TS be there as well (commented
out for now)? If so it's missing utility, type_traits, ratio, chrono,
system_error, functional, memory, future and algorithm.

Of course, while the files are missing and the tests for the mare
commented out the test can't fail and so only really serves as a
reminder/placeholder for what's missing.