[patch] change specific int128 -> generic intN

DJ Delorie dj@redhat.com
Fri May 9 02:21:00 GMT 2014


> Assuming that the formula sizeof(type)*char_bit==precision works for all 

It doesn't.  THe MSP430 has __int20 for example.

Would it be acceptable for the compiler to always define a set of
macros for each of the intN types?  I would have thought that would be
discouraged, but it would be an easier way to handle it.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list