[patch] Update libstdc++ FAQ and ensure stable anchors in HTML docs

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 22/06/14 22:40 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>This fairly tedious patch refreshes the FAQ, including adding some
>>notes saying "This answer is old and probably no longer relevant" to
>>several answers referring to problems in the GCC 3.x era.
>
>I'm wondering, should those old items be removed?  GCC 3.x is
>really a looong while ago (and I did check some of those items).

Yes, that would probably be better. I considered doing that but didn't
want to spend the time to decide which ones to cull.

Suggestions are welcome.

>A FAQ that containts many NAFAQs (not actually frequently asked 
>questions) may actually be less useful and paint a more negative
>picture.

Good point.