--std vs __intN
DJ Delorie
dj@redhat.com
Fri Jun 6 22:23:00 GMT 2014
> Seems like a lot. Since gcc only supports 2's complement, min is -max-1
> for signed type and 0 for unsigned, it doesn't need a macro. Etc. But I
> agree that's a detail.
They're defined that way, just like all the other stdint types, but
they're still defined.
> Yes. That's my point, it may be better to change a couple minor things in
> the testsuite instead of making something too complicated in the library.
Ah, ok.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list