--std vs __intN

DJ Delorie dj@redhat.com
Fri Jun 6 22:23:00 GMT 2014


> Seems like a lot. Since gcc only supports 2's complement, min is -max-1 
> for signed type and 0 for unsigned, it doesn't need a macro. Etc. But I 
> agree that's a detail.

They're defined that way, just like all the other stdint types, but
they're still defined.

> Yes. That's my point, it may be better to change a couple minor things in 
> the testsuite instead of making something too complicated in the library.

Ah, ok.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list