testsuite allocators patch

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 23/07/14 22:33 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>On 27/06/2014 21:48, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>On 06/27/2014 07:33 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>I didn't see an obvious fix (I'm not sure if the templated constructor
>>>can deduce its argument since the change) but have been out all day
>>>and not had a chance to look into it.
>>Ok, thanks. I'm reverting the last two libstdc++-v3 commits.
>>
>>Paolo.
>>
>
>Hi
>
>    Back from vacation, ready to have this patch committed eventually.
>
>    Here is the new version with the missing default and copy constructor.
>
>    I have a small question regarding some code next to the one I am 
>modifying in this patch. I can see lines like:
>
>      propagating_allocator() noexcept = default;
>
>    When using a default implementation shouldn't we let the compiler 
>decide if it should be noexcept or not depending on the member fields 
>or base class default constructors ?
>
>    Tested under Linux x86_64.
>
>    Ok to commit ?

OK, thanks.