Many check_debug regressions

[François Dumont]

On 01/13/2014 11:31 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 10:53 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 13 January 2014 09:11, François Dumont wrote:
>>> I think that most of them are coming from this patch of never have been
>>> validated/applied.
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2013-12/msg00044.html
>> And never posted to gcc-patches ;-)
>>
>> The patch is OK, we do need those allocator-extended constructors, so
>> please post it to the lists (both of them!) again and commit, thanks.
> Great. Note however, that the above backward logic means that, at some 
> point, somebody, committed a debug-mode change which caused many 
> regressions. And we went ahead, reported no regression in debug-mode 
> for additional unrelated changes... Worrisome...
>
> Does the patch also fix the check-debug failures in 
> testsuite/experimental ?
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo.
> .
>
     The patch is now applied. I haven't notice any failure in 
experimental part so just tell me if you still see it. As I said in the 
mail announcing application of the patch the profile mode will need it too.

François