Many check_debug regressions

[Paolo Carlini]

On 01/13/2014 10:53 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 13 January 2014 09:11, François Dumont wrote:
>> I think that most of them are coming from this patch of never have been
>> validated/applied.
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2013-12/msg00044.html
> And never posted to gcc-patches ;-)
>
> The patch is OK, we do need those allocator-extended constructors, so
> please post it to the lists (both of them!) again and commit, thanks.
Great. Note however, that the above backward logic means that, at some 
point, somebody, committed a debug-mode change which caused many 
regressions. And we went ahead, reported no regression in debug-mode for 
additional unrelated changes... Worrisome...

Does the patch also fix the check-debug failures in testsuite/experimental ?

Thanks,
Paolo.