[patch] Simplify non-inline function definitions for std::unordered_xxx containers
François Dumont
frs.dumont@gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 22:32:00 GMT 2014
On 03/12/2014 16:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> François (or anyone else), do you see any problem with this change?
>
> It makes the code shorter and I think is much easier to read, it also
> reduces the memory total shown by -ftime-report.
>
No, no problem. Interesting to see what benefit we can have when
reducing number of template parameters. I will try to recall it in the
future.
François
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list