Aw: Re: [Ping][Patch] Speedup Riemann Zeta

[Florian Goth]

Hi!
Thanks for your reply, I just wondered a bit about the silence.
I have tested the patch myself. But I will run the testsuite tonight(To find out how it is working)
And I will prepare another patch. Regarding the paperwork, I think I have done my part.
Right now, I am waiting for the signed copy from the FSF.
Thanks,
Florian.


> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. August 2014 um 17:02 Uhr
> Von: "Ed Smith-Rowland" <3dw4rd@verizon.net>
> An: "Florian Goth" <CaptainSifff@gmx.de>, "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
> Betreff: Re: [Ping][Patch] Speedup Riemann Zeta
>
> On 08/19/2014 10:54 AM, Florian Goth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > in my attempt to get to know the handling within this list and
> > how patches are dealt within gcc,
> > I posted a while ago this patch here
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2014-08/msg00033.html
> >
> >
> > Anything wrong with it?
> > I would like to learn which guidelines I have to respect,
> > before I try to get the larger patches for the Polylog function into libstdc++.
> >
> > Thanks for your time,
> > Florian.
> >
> Florian,
> 
> I've been busy, sorry.
> I'll get to it tonight.
> It looks good from a brief scan.
> 
> The comment
> //again the zeroth order
> 
> Should be alone on the line above.
> 
> 1. Have you run the testsuite?
> 2. How is your paperwork going?
> 
>