Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
Paolo Carlini
paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Mon Sep 30 19:57:00 GMT 2013
On 9/30/13 9:33 PM, François Dumont wrote:
> Regarding number of comparisons in sort algo I don't think that it
> is a regression of this patch right ? I only remove duplication of
> code, didn't change number of invocation of functors.
Certainly. Of course, however, any sort of help in this area too is more
than welcome, eg figure out if we regressed recently or the HP / SGI
code already performed redundant comparisons in some striking special
cases of small vectors (granted that the O complexity was of course fine).
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list