Problem with _Hashtable_ebo_helper

[Jason Merrill]

On 10/23/2013 02:53 AM, frs.dumont@gmail.com wrote:
> That is indeed an issue. We have to force the 3rd template parameter to
> true in this context because we are using _Hastable_ebo_helper here only
> for convenience to access protected default ctor if any. We know that
> _Hashtable_code_base is not final so it is safe to force true. I'll
> submit a patch when back home.

I assume you mean the following; I'm going to check it in now to avoid 
regressions from my front end patch.  I'm still interested in feedback 
on my proposed change to the default template argument.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ebo1.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 883 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20131023/16254970/attachment.bin>