Buggy test 20_util/exchange/1.cc

[Marc Glisse]

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Diego Novillo wrote:

> +int f(int __attribute__((unused)) x) { return 0; }
> +
> +double f(double __attribute__((unused)) x) { return 0; }

This is C++, why do you want to name unused arguments?

-- 
Marc Glisse