[patch] fix libstdc++/56278

Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Wed Feb 13 10:19:00 GMT 2013


On 02/12/2013 09:54 PM, François Dumont wrote:
>     Of course this is not mandatory but I think _Hash_code_base would 
> be cleaner this way only exposing as public what is required by C++11. 
> It can also wait for 4.9.
I like it. Thanks Francois. If Jon has no objections over the next day 
or so, please go ahead.

Thanks again!
Paolo.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list