Is libstdcxx-time still experimental?

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 31 October 2012 06:39, Václav Zeman wrote:
>
> The configure code could also try to look for clock_nanosleep().

Prior to POSIX 2008 clock_nanosleep was part of the Clock Selection
option, so we'd need to do a link test to see if it's actually
available, and we don't do any link tests unless
--enable-libstdcxx-time is used.  If that's used, we will find
nanosleep() and not need clock_nanosleep() anyway.