breakage with "[v3] (almost) finish <scoped_allocator>"

Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler@gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 20:48:00 GMT 2012


2012/10/19 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
>> Looks like _U is one of those identifiers that should be
>> avoided:
>
> [...]
>>
>> What's the preferred replacement?
>
>
> std::pair seems to use _U1 and _U2 rather than _U and _V.

When not numbered, I have seen (and used) _Up (similar to _Tp).

- Daniel



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list