RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
Xinliang David Li
Wed Nov 28 01:17:00 GMT 2012
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Chris Lattner <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:32 PM, Eric Botcazou <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> I admit that I'm partly fishing here, but my proposal is based on the
>>> * The implementation of PCH in GCC is atrocious and hard to maintain.
>>> * The next C++ standard is likely to define modules
>>> * The user-base for PCH is negligibly small (here's where I'm mostly
>>> guessing). * PCH is absolutely useless for C.
>>> Removing PCH will give us more implementation freedom for the memory
>>> management project
>> One of the arguments put forward to advocate the transition to C++ was the
>> competition. Where do the other compilers stand when it comes to PCHs?
> Clang has fantastic support for PCH... and soon modules.
Are they sharing some implementations?
>We don't plan to drop PCH support when modules is implemented.
More information about the Libstdc++