safe unordered local iterators

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 20 July 2011 22:40, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 10:46 PM, François Dumont wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>>    Sorry for the inconvenience. Here is my proposition for the renaming, I

I should probably apologise for the inconvenience for suggesting
changing it!  I do think it is a bit confusing though, the "Sequence"
containers in the standard library have a definite ordering, so an
unordered sequence is confusing :)

>> haven't tested it yet but will of course before commiting.
>
> I'm Ok with it if Jonathan is...

Yes, thanks for changing it.

> Thanks,
> Paolo.
>
> PS: my first language obviously isn't English, but I see you are using
> <proposition> a lot where I would normally prefer <proposal>...

Yes, proposal would be correct there.