[RFA,doc] libstdc++ FAQ and bug reporting
Gerald Pfeifer
gerald@pfeifer.com
Sun Jan 30 14:46:00 GMT 2011
This first part of this patch is obvious. While looking into a similar
issue in the second hunk I realized that probably the entire paragraph
could/should go. It does not look current / like a FAQ any more these
days.
Okay?
Gerald
2011-01-30 Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
* doc/xml/faq.xml: Adjust link to bug database.
Remove old item on broken header files.
Index: doc/xml/faq.xml
===================================================================
--- doc/xml/faq.xml (revision 169407)
+++ doc/xml/faq.xml (working copy)
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@
</para>
<para>
Before reporting a bug, please examine the
- <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html">bugs database</link> with the
+ <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/">bugs database</link> with the
category set to <quote>g++</quote>.
</para>
</answer>
@@ -848,14 +848,6 @@
</question>
<answer xml:id="a-v2_headers">
<para>
- If you have found an extremely broken header file which is
- causing problems for you, look carefully before submitting a
- "high" priority bug report (which you probably
- shouldn't do anyhow; see the last paragraph of the page
- describing <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html">the GCC
- bug database</link>).
- </para>
- <para>
If the headers are in <filename>${prefix}/include/g++-3</filename>, or
if the installed library's name looks like
<filename>libstdc++-2.10.a</filename> or
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list