[RFA,doc] libstdc++ FAQ and bug reporting

Gerald Pfeifer gerald@pfeifer.com
Sun Jan 30 14:46:00 GMT 2011


This first part of this patch is obvious.  While looking into a similar 
issue in the second hunk I realized that probably the entire paragraph 
could/should go.  It does not look current / like a FAQ any more these
days.

Okay?

Gerald

2011-01-30  Gerald Pfeifer  <gerald@pfeifer.com>
 
	* doc/xml/faq.xml: Adjust link to bug database.
	Remove old item on broken header files.

Index: doc/xml/faq.xml
===================================================================
--- doc/xml/faq.xml	(revision 169407)
+++ doc/xml/faq.xml	(working copy)
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@
     </para> 
     <para> 
     Before reporting a bug, please examine the
-    <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html">bugs database</link> with the
+    <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/">bugs database</link> with the
     category set to <quote>g++</quote>. 
     </para> 
   </answer>
@@ -848,14 +848,6 @@
   </question>
   <answer xml:id="a-v2_headers">
       <para>
-	If you have found an extremely broken header file which is
-	causing problems for you, look carefully before submitting a
-	"high" priority bug report (which you probably
-	shouldn't do anyhow; see the last paragraph of the page
-	describing <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html">the GCC
-	bug database</link>).
-      </para>
-      <para>
 	If the headers are in <filename>${prefix}/include/g++-3</filename>, or
 	if the installed library's name looks like
 	<filename>libstdc++-2.10.a</filename> or



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list