[RFA] DR 1325 vs cons/2.cc

[Paolo Carlini]

Hi,
> Hmm, that test was pretty contrived - that particular code isn't
> necessarily realistic or required to work. It could be removed,
> however this change would still test the same thing, while allowing
> the template arguments to be deduced and call the new constructor:
>   
Excellent. The below is what I actually committed. Includes a much
better testcase -2.

Tested x86_64-linux.

Paolo.

//////////////////////
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: CL_dr1325
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20101011/2a2794ac/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch_dr1325_2
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20101011/2a2794ac/attachment-0001.ksh>