[v3] fix libstdc++/44647
Tue Oct 5 11:53:00 GMT 2010
On 10/05/2010 12:56 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> OK, thanks. I'm always confused by that so will try to remember in
> future: the new file contains old code, and now it looks as though
> the bad_alloc definition was not copyrighted prior to 2010 ... which I
> find odd.
The rule I always followed is that a new file has only the Copyright
year of the current year. Otherwise, if each specific bit of content
counts one would have to track back the year each appeared in the
repository or just guess (often wrongly) and add also years predating
its existence. That said, I have no problem with changing the rules I
followed so far...
More information about the Libstdc++