[RFC] C++1x breaking the ABI in one more place :(
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Wed May 19 18:27:00 GMT 2010
On 05/19/2010 02:18 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> so I was finally getting around to adding the new C++1x member functions
It's still C++0x until we have a final number.
> to std::time_get (also needed in order to implement the std::get_time
> free function) when I noticed that we should also add a new *virtual*
> function, do_get, and that breaks of course the ABI because, eg, on
> x86_64, the size of the object itself grows from 80 to 88...
>
> Off the top of my head, I can't imagine any trick we can play to avoid
> breaking the ABI when adding an additional virtual, but I admit not
> being such an expert in this area, and I'm looking for advice...
It already has virtual functions, so it shouldn't affect the size of the
object. Adding an additional function to the end of the vtable should
be backward binary compatible except for derived classes that add
virtual functions (and therefore append them to the vtable, clashing
with do_get).
I would bring this up with the library WG, though.
Jason
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list