regex patch

[Stephen M. Webb]

On 18/06/10 14:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 18 June 2010 18:32, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> > (1) I have two test cases that fail because the functionality has not yet
> > been implemented.  What is the standard operating procedure for this?
> >  I'd rather have failing tests cases that eventually get fixed than to
> > have the problems missed because the test cases are absent or xfailed.
>
> Is it functionality in <regex> or elsewhere in the library?  In any
> case, the tests could be checked in as XFAILs.

OK, the fails are onyl in <regex>.  I have xfailed them for now.  Fixed my 
regeneration problem, too, and I have a patch ready to go.

One last question, though.  This introduces an abi_check failure.  Should that 
be fixed first?

-- 
Stephen M. Webb
stephen.webb@bregmasoft.ca