unsafe STL patch

Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Thu Jan 28 21:04:00 GMT 2010


... ah yes, I have in mind a more specific comment, about your general
idea: I'm not sure to understand why you are calling .base() only for
random access iterators: as far as I can see, assuming you have a
_Safe_iterator, that's always the correct thing to do...

Paolo.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list