New numeric_limits traits for C++-0x.

[Paolo Carlini]

On 02/24/2010 04:00 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> The radix was a leftover from when I thought I needed this for
> integral types.  The max_decimal10 are all zero for integral types.
> I was about to take it out when I thought we'll need to do this for
> decimal types someday.  (I think we are responsible for decimal
> additions to other headers.  Later.)
>
> I can take it out for now if you want.
Yes, please.
> I was being bone headed about the static const members.  Of course
> they need definition.  I'll do that in limits.cc (actually
> limits_c++0x.cc).
The latter doesn't exist anymore, actually.
> Now about gnu.ver.  What if the new symbols are already covered by an
> existing pattern?  Can I just add a new empty version?
You have to tighten the baseline patterns to not "catch" the new
symbols. When you are sure that abi_check doesn't fail, add the new
exports at the current version.

Paolo.