c++0x tests fixes
Thu Dec 2 20:48:00 GMT 2010
On 2 December 2010 20:42, François Dumont wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 11:16 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> I would have asked you to fix "explicitly" and "constructor" before
>> approving it for checkin, but I like the solution that avoids testing
>> for C++0x mode. Thanks for finding and fixing it.
> Sorry, I will fix that next time I commit a patch.
> Maybe the attached one for the problem of deque/list/vector not being
> explicitly instantiatable with non default constructible types. Ok ?
Yes, that's ok to checkin - thanks very much.
More information about the Libstdc++