missing libstdc++.6 symbol on the trunk

Jonathan Wakely jwakely.gcc@gmail.com
Thu Dec 2 12:57:00 GMT 2010

On 2 December 2010 12:55, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 01:53 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=166171
>> N3092 changed the definition of future_category, but IIRC I had
>> intentionally not changed our version because of the ABI implications.
>>  We should probably do a backwards-compatibility fix so that
>> _ZSt15future_category is still exported with the correct symver.
> Right, I just came to the same conclusion (and I don't see why the new
> symbol can't just be versioned @GLIBCXX_3.4.15). Are you willing to work
> on it?

Sure, I'll do it tonight.

More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list