missing libstdc++.6 symbol on the trunk
Thu Dec 2 12:57:00 GMT 2010
On 2 December 2010 12:55, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 01:53 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> N3092 changed the definition of future_category, but IIRC I had
>> intentionally not changed our version because of the ABI implications.
>> We should probably do a backwards-compatibility fix so that
>> _ZSt15future_category is still exported with the correct symver.
> Right, I just came to the same conclusion (and I don't see why the new
> symbol can't just be versioned @GLIBCXX_3.4.15). Are you willing to work
> on it?
Sure, I'll do it tonight.
More information about the Libstdc++