c++0x tests fixes

François Dumont francois.cppdevs@free.fr
Wed Dec 1 20:43:00 GMT 2010

So I would simply propose to hide the explicit instantiation with a 

Ok ?

On 11/30/2010 01:03 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 11/30/2010 12:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Whether it's overkill or not, I don't like the name - it's a feature
>> of C++0x, not the fact the implementation is experimental.
> I agree, first blush I also didn't like the name. As I tried to say
> already, I'm also a bit concerned that we may end up multiplying the
> number of gates beyond control, but I don't have a very strong opinion.
> Paolo.

More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list