Version script vs. mangled names on systems where size_type != unsigned int

[Paolo Carlini]

On 12/17/2009 11:40 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
> Should we just add a 'y' in there? I think it might be that this hasn't
> been a problem on any of the other 64-bit arches because win64 is the only
> LLP64 target we support, and it's only just gained support for shared libstdc;
> on all the other 64-bit targets the size_type will still be an unsigned
> integer, but on this target the ABI says that size_type is a ULL, so that
> means that the signatures of ABI functions are going to be different on this
> machine from other machines.
>   
Yes, it's fine, I added some comments to the audit trail before seeing
this message of yours.

Paolo.